Framing inequity safely: Whites' motivated perceptions of racial privilege.

نویسندگان

  • Brian S Lowery
  • Eric D Knowles
  • Miguel M Unzueta
چکیده

Racial inequity was theorized to threaten Whites' self-image when inequity is framed as White privilege but not when framed as anti-Black discrimination. Manipulations of Whites' need for self-regard were hypothesized to affect their perceptions of White privilege but not of anti-Black discrimination. In Experiment 1, White participants reported less privilege when given threatening (vs. affirming) feedback on an intelligence or personality test; in contrast, perceptions of anti-Black discrimination were unaffected by self-concept manipulations. In Experiment 2, threatening (vs. affirming) feedback decreased privilege perceptions only among Whites high in racial identity. Using a value-based self-affirmation manipulation, Experiment 3 replicated the effect of self-image concerns on Whites' perceptions of privilege and provided evidence that self-concerns, through their effect on perceived privilege, influence Whites' support for redistributive social policies.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The hard-knock life? Whites claim hardships in response to racial inequity

• We explore why and how Whites deny the existence of racial privilege • We introduce belief in personal privilege as important to psychology of privilege • When given privilege evidence, Whites claim more life hardships • Whites use hardship claims to deny personally benefitting from privilege • Self-affirmed Whites acknowledge personal privilege and support equality policies a b s t r a c t a...

متن کامل

Whites' Desire to Affiliate and Perceived Understanding in Interracial Interactions

• Whites' affiliation predicts perceived understanding of Blacks' racial experiences. • Self-image goals mediate the effect of affiliation on perceived understanding. • Whites and Blacks disagree about how well Whites understand racial experiences. • Differences in affiliation cause divergent perceptions of understanding. a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f o Four studies investigated whether t...

متن کامل

Paying for positive group esteem: how inequity frames affect whites' responses to redistributive policies.

This article finds that, when faced with racial inequity framed as White advantage, Whites' desire to think well of their racial group increases their support for policies perceived to harm Whites. Across 4 studies, the article provides evidence that (a) relative to minority disadvantage, White advantage increases Whites' support for policies perceived to reduce their group's economic opportuni...

متن کامل

The role of race and ethnicity in climate change polarization: evidence from a U.S. national survey experiment

Research suggests that public divides on climate change may often be rooted in identity processes, driven in part by a motivation to associate with others with similar political and ideological views. In a large split-ballot national survey experiment of 2041 U.S. adults, we explored the role of a non-partisan identity—racial/ethnic majority andminority status—in climate change opinion, in addi...

متن کامل

Group-based Differences in Perceptions of Racism: What Counts, to Whom, and Why?

Belonging to a group fundamentally shapes the way we interpret and attribute the behavior of others. Similarly, perceptions of racism can be inf luenced by group membership. Experimental and survey research reveal disagreement between Whites and Blacks about the prevalence of racism in America. Several social cognitive factors contribute to this disagreement: discrepancies in Whites’ and Blacks...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Personality & social psychology bulletin

دوره 33 9  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007